10-2f0a What natural selection favored was complex thinking, not complex sentences. A gene for syntax (complex sentences) is ‘junk’ portion, as it were (i.e., not necessary).

10-2f1 Chomsky’s UG approach only looks at a subset (syntax) of a subset (language) of the whole (communication system — ‘the gestalt’). Syntax is only secondary to conversation.

4-2b Good storytelling is about taking readers to something slightly in advance by using what they already know
10-2d2 ‘The tools for thought’ do not necessarily have to accommodate recursiveness, because we can think recursively nonetheless

Tool complexity ≠ Linguistic complexity
10-2f0b Complex tools do not necessarily require complex languages (Tool complexity ≠ Linguistic complexity)
10-1b1 It is the body that learns - ‘考えるな. 感じろ.‘
7-1b2b1 The best is seeing the front by yourself, because inexplicit and unconscious ideas exist between heads not within them