6-3b1 Users become owners with tokens

own

• 3-1a4e システムとユーザーはつながっているだけでなくハウリングしあっている

  • 7-1d2a The relation between technology and the problem-situation (i.e., culture and mind) is reflexive

• Users become owners with tokens

  • 7-1b0 The creator-user (or producer-consumer) distinction is arbitrary. There are no ‘producers’ and ‘consumers’ in the non-human world.categories
    • No ownership means you can’t wear clothes you want, you can’t resell or reinvest in your house or car, and you have to change your name wherever you go
      • Homeowners invest more than renters
        • Airbnb exist because homeowners can do whatever they want
      • Ownership means you don’t have to ask for permission
        • 2-1b2e0 The less guessing layers the better
        • 6-3b0a Ownership means trading
    • The digital should see more ownership as there are in the physical
      • 8-1b2 Digital-physical is entwined
        • 6-3b6 Digital-native ownership can address ambiguities of physical ones

• 6-3b2 In corporate networks you can only quit

  • 6-3b3 Don’t think corporate network structure (especially its incentives) is the norm
    • 6-3b4 Tokens are the natural asset class to provide a sensible organizational structure for networks
      • 6-3b5 Tokens encapsulate complicated code (primarily, ownership) into an uncomplicated wrapper
        • 6-3b6 Digital-native ownership can address ambiguities of physical ones
          • 6-3b7 NFT = A digital twin of the physical object
            • But remember: 6-3b8 You can’t really influence legacy-analog-land from frontier-digital-cloud, nor should you.
    • 6-3b3a Networks with billions of owners are possible
      • 6-3b3b Not differentiating developers from users mean what attracts the former also attracts the latter, and vice versa
        • 6-3b3c Tasks held captive as proprietary in corporate networks become market-based
          • 6-3b3d Externalized incentives (negative externalities) go away when everything is externalized
            • 6-3b3e Everyone benefits in blockchain and protocol networks

• Dogecoin is a silly network but it’s owned by the users

  • It’s a part of their identity stack
    • Dogecoin demonstrates the power of tokens absent confounding factors

---

以下は、AI寄りの観点で、インターフェースを考え直そうというアイデアだが、クリエーターとユーザーを峻別する必然性はないという主張において類似している。
「言葉と物事の関係性は一対である」という考えが流布しているからこそ、遊びが必要である。例えば、Google に対抗して Cioran ブラウザーや、三浦雄一郎ブラウザーがあったっていい。いいねボタンだけでなく、変だねボタンやズレてるボタンがあったっていい。クリエーターとユーザーという構図における区切りも曖昧になったっていい。もっと量子力学的 (Everettian) なインターフェースが増えていい。
12-1f 言葉と物事の関係性が一対である必要性はない (e.g., 二項同体)
6-3b1.1 Collect is the new like