1-2g2s7b You can’t justify the predicted value of the probability inductively, because theory (i.e., the laws of physics) provides the probability, not the experiment

Experimental results cannot be used to verify theories due to the non-determinacy which is inherent in each universe—it can be only used to falsify theories. Fallibilism is implied in the multiverse.

“Every formula purporting to predict the sequence of outcomes will eventually fail: that tests the unpredictability. And in the overwhelming majority of universes (and histories) the surge will happen approximately half the time: that tests the predicted value of the probability. Only a tiny proportion of the instances of the observers will see anything different.”

Next:

• 1-2g2s7b1 The laws of physics provides the measure (provides a meaning to proportions and averages for infinite sets) for the multiverse
• 1-2g2s7c Very unlikely event certainly happens somewhere in the multiverse

Related:

• You cannot be proven right
  • 1-2a2 Logical reasoning is no less a physical process than scientific reasoning is, and it is inherently fallible
  • 1-2b In the quest for truth, what matters is the explanation and not where it came from (the quest for truth ≠ a quest for certainty-justification-necessity)
  • 1-2g2j1d Cantgotu environments - you will always be proven wrong because no program will render it; you can never prove that you were there
  • 1-2g2j1b Accuracy in virtual reality = The relationship between theory and experiment in science. That is, you can never prove-experience-measure-certify that it’s accurate-true program.
• Fallibilism is implied in the multiverse
  • 13-1a3b The subjective value theory persists because of the multiverse—because we are fallible
• However, better explanations are less fallible because they are hard to varydevelop
  • 10-2g1b1 Scientific discourses are less fallible because the fundamental theories of physics are exceedingly hard to vary
• Uncertainty and human actions
  • 13-1a1 The uncertainty of the future must be true because the contrary would completely negate the possibility of action
  • 13-1a2 The omnipresence of uncertainty introduces the ever-present possibility of error in human action
  • 13-8a2 The demand for money stems from fundamental uncertainty about both the future environment and the future-self
• On ‘uncertainty principle’
  • 1-2g2t5b The term ‘uncertainty principle’ is doubly misleading because first of all fungibility is a physical fact and not uncertainty of anything, and second of all because it can be derived from more general principle of quantum physics