To develop an insight if something is really a problem, you have to spend a bit more time, I think.
Related:
- 2-1a6c1a ‘First-conclusion bias’ - Separate the problem-defining phase of the decision-making process from the problem-solving phaseelaborate
- 7-1a2a You will be solving universal problems by attending to local-parochial problems first
- 9-1b You can’t really transfer your knowledge to others, because each knowledge has to be created individually
- 10-2g3a Everything is (or more precisely, became) symbol. Social values-knowledge-structures themselves are symbols represented by non-explicit forms (e.g., traditions and habits) interpreted non-explicitly (‘流れ込む情報’).
The best is seeing the front by yourself, but you can still nudge people to talk recent specific instances, and dig into the ‘why’
- 1-1c5b Asking what surprised them usually is an extremely useful question
- 4-1d2 Most people love talking about themselves
And I guess you can do the same with LLMs, if you know how to use them effectively