5-1b1a2c0 No theory can exhaust reality

Next:

• 5-1b1a2c0.1 Perfect replication is impossible

Related:

• There is no substantial difference between social sciences (社会科学) and science proper (自然科学—whatever that means)
  • 3-1a The reality doesn’t have categories, there are only problems to be solved. Be problem-project-oriented. ‘Academic subjects’ are mere social constructs.
• 7-1d2a4 Tech innovation can (and did) drive pragmatic changes in regulation
  • Similar to how networks and derivatives are infinitedevelop
• There will be newer L1s that integrate L2s existing on different chains
  • The sphere of interoperability expands endlessly, as it were (1-2g3 The sphere of comprehensibility expands infinitely)
    • No one chain can solve everything
      • Similar to derivatives
        • 8-1c2a What matters is the creativity per se, because non-creative parts will be made easier
          • Remember: 5-3b Knowledge creates new frontiers (and new markets)

Inspired by Lachmann (p. 83)revisit

• 3-1a5 Any explanation must evoke human creativity (i.e., our ability to come up with explanations) fully—do not evoke others to justify your theory (see this)revisit
  • 1-2g2s8 The unobserved parts of the wider phenomenon have in no way affected what we observe, yet they are essential to its explanation. Causation doesn’t exhaust explanation.
    • 1-2g2t3f Contingency can be only realized when you evoke the multiverse
    • 10-2e4 Other times (in ‘our universe’) are just special cases of other universes. There is no demarcation between other times and other universes in the multiverse.
      • 13-1a3a2e5.1 Money necessarily evokes prices in the past—in barter economy, this is not necessarily the case
      • 13-8a3 Money must evoke the past, but the demand for money lies in the future
  • 3-1a4a1 The whole must be evoked in explaining the parts
  • 10-2d2e9e Evolution of ‘other life-forms’ must evoke the influence of human existence
  • 13-5f1 You must evoke others to explain the interest rate
• 9-1b0 Knowledge (both explicit and inexplicit) is created individually. You don’t say “I took it from him.” You can’t blame “he took it from me.”