“Nothing clears up a case so much as stating it to another person, and I can hardly expect your co-operation if I do not show you the position from which we start.” – Sherlock Holmes

Next:

Related:


  • It’s an inversion of:

  • RUL3 - List ⇒ Rank ⇒ Iterate

    • ORGANAZATIONAL
      • “Do they know what you value most?” I hesitated. He looked me square in the eye. “Shane, do you know what you value most?” I stared at him blankly. He sighed. “The problem isn’t your team. It’s you. You don’t know what’s most important. Until you do, your team will never make decisions without you. It’s too risky for them to figure out the most important thing. Communicate that to your team, and they’ll be able to make decisions on their own.”
    • INDIVIDUAL
      • Remember: the goal isn’t to have someone tell you what to do; rather, it’s to learn how an expert thinks about the problem, which variables they consider relevant, and how those variables interact over time. If you ask them how they think about the problem, that’s when you start deepening your understanding.

MentalModelsSystems
MentalModelsBiology


E.g.,

  • Every’s AI-native engineering philosophy
    • Team collaboration—The shift: traditional (Person A writes → Person B reviews) vs. compound (Person A creates plan → AI implements → AI agents review → Person B reviews the AI review → merge). Standards: explicit plan sign-off required (“Silence is not approval”), PR ownership stays with the person who initiated. Human reviewers focus on intent, not implementation: “Does this match what we agreed to build?” Don’t bother checking syntax/security/performance/style—“that’s what the review agents already did.” Async by default: “Plans can be created, reviewed, and approved without scheduling a meeting.” Scaling: clear ownership, feature flags + small PRs, compound docs replace tribal knowledge (“Instead of ‘Ask Sarah, she knows how auth works,’ Sarah runs /compound after implementing the feature”).