1-2g2s7b3 An explanation for how something really works cannot rely on infinity
E.g., Xeno’s paradox is resolved by seeing what happens in reality. The explanations shouldn’t use the number of points that are an uncountable infinity.
The error here is in conflating two separate phenomena (mathematical abstract infinity and physical infinity) that happen to have the same name
12-1f 言葉と物事の関係性が一対である必要性はない (e.g., 二項同体)