10-2g1f3 We can only figure out what they know by what they do ('performance'), because we can never directly study what people know ('competence'). To assert that we can is a common error in thinking.

1-2g2j1b Accuracy in virtual reality = The relationship between theory and experiment in science. That is, you can never prove-experience-measure-certify that it’s accurate-true program.

The Turing test is one such behavioristic mistake
1-2g1b What matters is the explanation, and not what you can see
Behaviorism

1-2g2c1 Testability matters only when you have a good explanation (hard-to-vary explanation)
E.g., exams can’t exhaustively measure its students’ competence, but it’s the one of few ways by which we can indirectly test them via their performances
develop

We must interpret other humans:
9-1b2b Technology, knowledge, and people constitute symbols (including relations, because relations are also symbols)
10-2g3a Everything is (or more precisely, became) symbol. Social values-knowledge-structures themselves are symbols represented by non-explicit forms (e.g., traditions and habits) interpreted non-explicitly (‘流れ込む情報’).
2-1a1a1b ‘Hanlon’s razor’ - We (they) are dumber and thus less ill-intent than we think we (they) are

MentalModels
develop

Mises’ praxeology
Mises