“LLMs produce artifacts that look expert. They don’t yet produce moves that survive experts.” – Ankit Maloo (20260208)
Related:
- 1-2g2j1b Accuracy in virtual reality = The relationship between theory and experiment in science. That is, you can never prove-experience-measure-certify that it’s accurate-true program.
- 9-4b3b1 Popper - ‘We let our ideas die in our place’ (another difference between memes vs genes)revisit
The Turing test is one such behavioristic mistake—e.g., exams can’t exhaustively measure the students’ competence. But it’s one of the few ways by which we can indirectly test them via their performances. And I think writing is the ultimate Turing test.Behaviorism
- 1-2g1b What matters is the explanation, and not what you can see
- 1-2g2c1 Testability matters only when you have a good explanation (hard-to-vary explanation)
- 1-2g2j1a Because we can only be with the virtual-reality, all our renderings will be inaccurate
- 9-4b Writing generates ideas
- 9-4c1 If you can’t write about it, you can’t code it. If you can’t program it, you don’t understand it.
We must interpret other humans:
- 2-1a1a1b ‘Hanlon’s razor’ - We (they) are dumber and thus less ill-intent than we think we (they) are
- 9-1b You can’t really transfer your knowledge to others, because each knowledge has to be created individually
- 9-1b2b Technology, knowledge, and people constitute symbols (including relations, because relations are also symbols)
In praxeological terms:
- 13-6f Praxeology is concerned with that part of value scales that can be ascertained from actions
- 13-8a2b Prices do not exhaust value scales, but value scales can be ascertained only through prices in money economy
- 13-8a2c Value scales are ascertainable from the real actions, not vice versa—because value scales cannot be exhausted
Luck-Skill dichotomy doesn’t exist, at least objectively—it’s open to interpretations:revisit